Decoding the Diet Battle: Vegan vs. Omnivorous – What You Need to Know

Ever wondered what would happen if veganism went head-to-head with the classic omnivorous lifestyle? Well, buckle up because we’re about to spill the beans on a groundbreaking study that unraveled the mysteries behind these dietary powerhouses.

The Showdown

Imagine the scene: forks clashing with knives, fruits gearing up against flanks and shanks. In a recent face-off, researchers from Stanford University orchestrated a showdown between 22 sets of identical twins. One twin in each duo embraced the vegan life for eight weeks, while their counterpart stuck to the omnivorous route. It was a diet duel for the ages!

Guess who emerged as the victor? The vegans, hands down! Not only did they shed more weight than their omnivorous counterparts, but they also flaunted improved health markers. Lower fasting insulin and LDL cholesterol levels were their badges of honour, while the omnivores remained relatively unchanged. A surprise victory, but there’s more to the story.

The Plot Twists

The vegan warriors did experience a dip in ‘good’ cholesterol (HDL) and a drop in vitamin B12 levels, but nothing to lose sleep over. Differences in fiber and saturated fat intake, especially from legumes and whole grains, played a role in these changes.

Here’s What You Need to Know

  • Balanced Choices Trump Extreme Diets: Whether you’re team vegan or omnivorous, the key is balance. Extreme diets might bring short-term wins, but the real victory lies in making sustainable, balanced choices. It’s all about long-term health, not a quick fix.
  • Navigating the Learning Curve: Thinking of tiptoeing into a more plant-based lifestyle? Take it easy! Gradual changes are the secret sauce. Swap out a meaty dinner for a plant-powered one once a week. It’s about progress, not perfection.
  • Universality of Healthy Eating: Here’s the golden rule: healthy eating is universal. Load up on minimally processed foods, get that protein in, and paint your plate with a rainbow of fruits and veggies. Your body will thank you, whether you’re munching on kale or embracing the occasional steak.

In the end, it’s not about declaring a winner in the diet duel. It’s about finding what works for you – a diet that fuels your energy, supports your health, and lets you enjoy the journey. So, whether you’re slicing into a juicy steak or savouring a vibrant salad, here’s to a healthy, balanced life!


Unlocking the Mystery of Obesity: The Protein Leverage Hypothesis

The puzzle of obesity is one that humanity has grappled with for centuries. How did we, with all our cognitive prowess, succumb to the temptations of modern diets? A groundbreaking study exploring the protein leverage hypothesis sheds light on an ancient biological mechanism that might just hold the key to understanding our collective struggle with weight.

What is Protein Leverage?

At its core, protein leverage suggests that humans, much like other species, have a built-in appetite for protein. This craving for protein guides our overall food consumption. Astonishingly, we continue eating until our protein needs are met, often consuming more calories than necessary to maintain a healthy weight.

However, it’s not merely about the quantity of protein; it’s about the ratio of protein to other macronutrients. This intricate dance of macronutrients influences our appetite in unexpected ways.

Protein Dilution: The Culprit in the Obesity Epidemic?

Even a slight “dilution” of protein in our diets, a decrease in the percentage of calories from protein coupled with an increase in calories from carbs and fat, can trigger a significant increase in overall food intake. This protein leverage mechanism explains, to a large extent, the surge in obesity rates.

Picture it as a lever—protein exerts leverage over our appetite, compelling us to consume more than required. And where do we find these highly diluted protein meals? Enter highly processed foods, particularly those high in fat and low in protein. The energy-dense nature of fat makes overconsumption all too easy.

The Feedback Loop of Weight Gain

As we gain weight, a feedback loop fueled by protein leverage is set in motion. A larger body demands more protein, leading us to consume more food in the quest for this essential nutrient. The result? An endless cycle of weight gain.

Yet, protein leverage isn’t a linear game. It’s most potent when calories from protein hover between 10 to 15 percent. A small dilution of protein within this range can significantly impact our appetite. However, when protein is excessively diluted and protein calories drop to around 5 percent, our bodies seem to hit the protein leverage “off” switch, curbing hunger.

Navigating the Protein Leverage Landscape

  • Not All Dilution is Equal: Interestingly, not all protein dilution is detrimental. A plant-based diet, naturally lower in protein, doesn’t trigger an increase in calorie consumption, thanks to the presence of fibre and water.
  • The Unknowns: While the protein leverage hypothesis provides a fascinating perspective on obesity, it’s essential to acknowledge the vast unknowns. Protein requirements vary significantly among individuals, influenced by factors such as age, weight, health, physical activity, and body composition.

While the protein leverage hypothesis contributes valuable insights into the obesity puzzle, it’s crucial to recognise the complexity of the issue. Obesity is a multifaceted problem with diverse contributing factors. Understanding protein leverage opens a door to comprehension, but the journey to solving the obesity mystery involves exploring a myriad of interconnected pathways. As we delve deeper into the intricate dance of macronutrients, we move one step closer to unravelling the secrets of our collective battle with weight.


Are Your Snacking Habits Undermining Your Diet?

In the jolly Christmas season, as everything feels festive, there’s a tug-of-war between good meals and those tempting snacks. Imagine doing great with your breakfast, lunch, and dinner, feeling like a healthy-eating champion. But, oh boy, then come the snacks. That moment when pantry chips or breakroom brownies wave at you, and suddenly, indulging a bit too much becomes a daily thing. Recently, researchers from King’s College London dived into this everyday tale, shining a light on our snacking ways and how they might be messing with our health goals.

How the Study Worked

Researchers dug into the food logs of 854 individuals over 13 days as part of a broader diet study. The goal was to define what constitutes a snack and assess the quality of these mini-meals using a Snack Diet Index (SDI) that rated foods based on processing levels.

In this study, a snack was any food or drink with calories consumed at least 30 minutes before or after a meal. “Healthy” or “unhealthy” was determined using the Snack Diet Index, favouring whole foods over highly processed ones.

Key Findings

The study unearthed intriguing patterns in snacking behaviours. A staggering 95% of participants embraced at least one daily snack, contributing a significant 25% to their daily calorie intake. Notably, snacks exhibited a tendency toward higher carbs and lower protein than main meals. The surprising revelation was the weak correlation between the quality of meals and snacks; individuals grappled with high-quality meals but struggled with low-quality snacks, and vice versa. Strikingly, frequent indulgence in high-quality snacks correlated with lower body fat, with nuts and seeds emerging as top-tier choices and cakes and pies falling into the low-quality category. For those classified as overweight or obese, opting for higher-quality snacks correlated with reduced hunger and lower insulin levels. Additionally, the timing of snacks played a role, as morning snackers leaned towards higher-quality, lower-calorie options in contrast to their evening counterparts.

Key Takeaways

  • Celebrate Success: If you’re acing those main meals, that’s a win. Acknowledge and celebrate those habits as the foundation for progress.
  • Explore Root Causes: Instead of a simple snack swap, dig into why you snack. Is it stress, meal satisfaction, or mindless munching? Address the root cause for lasting change.
  • Consider the Environment: Your surroundings matter. Prep and have easy access to healthy snacks – after all, if it’s there, chances are it’ll be eaten.

Your journey to well-being involves more than just meals; snacks play a crucial part. Just in time for the holidays, celebrate your successes in creating healthy meals and navigate snack challenges with a problem-solving mindset. Dive into why certain snacking habits persist, examine your environment, and remember the power of preparation. Your nutrition adventure is dynamic—each intentional snack choice is a step toward a healthier, happier you.


French Fries vs. Almonds: A Surprising 30-Day Study

For 30 days, a group of lucky participants got to enjoy a daily serving of French fries. Sounds like a dream, right? But this was no ordinary feast; it was a scientific experiment conducted by researchers from the University of Alabama-Birmingham. The goal? To test a fascinating hypothesis: would there be any difference in fat gain between those who added 300 calories of French fries to their daily diet compared to those who added 300 calories of almonds? Let’s dig into this study to uncover the results.


Observational studies have suggested a link between potato consumption, especially in the form of French fries and chips, and weight gain. However, these studies show correlation, not causation, leaving room for speculation. One possibility is that people who consume more potatoes might lead overall unhealthier lifestyles or have a tendency to overeat in general. Researchers acknowledge the limitations of such studies and cite a meta-analysis that indicates people tend to gain less weight than expected when they add energy (in the form of a specific food) to their diet. The theory is that individuals compensate for the extra calories by adjusting their behaviors.

The Study

This study was a randomised, controlled trial that involved 165 participants with an average age of 30 and an average BMI of 26. The majority (68%) were female, and none had type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Participants were divided into three groups:

  • Group #1: Almonds (the control group)
  • Group #2: French fries
  • Group #3: French fries with herb/spice mix

Each group was instructed to consume a pre-packaged, 300-calorie serving of their assigned food daily, with no other dietary modification instructions provided. Group #3 received an additional herb/spice mix to determine if it influenced the results. The researchers aimed to examine whether the herb/spice mix would affect how the participants’ bodies processed the calories.

Study Findings

The study found no significant differences in changes in fat mass between the groups. There were also no notable differences in body weight between the almond group and the French fries with the herb/spice mix group.

However, the group that consumed regular French fries (without the herb/spice mix) did experience a statistically different change in body weight compared to both the almond group and the herb/spice mix group.

Key Points to Consider

  • Short-Term Study: It’s crucial to note that this study was relatively short-term. While it measured changes in fat mass and body weight, it couldn’t assess the long-term health impact of such dietary changes over years or decades.
  • Lack of Monitoring: The researchers couldn’t monitor participants’ actual food intake or adherence to the dietary instructions. Whether participants followed the instructions precisely and consistently for 30 days remains unknown, making the differences in body weight less conclusive.
  • Potential Conflicts of Interest: The study received partial support from the Alliance for Potato Research and Education and included food donations from J.R. Simplot Company. Additionally, some of the researchers had received funding from the Almond Board and the Alliance for Potato Research and Education. While these factors were disclosed and didn’t affect the study’s methodology, they’re essential to consider when interpreting the results.

What You Can Learn from This Study

  1. Food Choices Matter: While the study suggests that adding 300 calories of French fries may not lead to more fat gain than the same calories from almonds, remember that the type of food you choose matters in your overall diet. Some foods are more satisfying and better for weight management than others.
  2. Nutrient-Rich Potatoes: Potatoes, including French fries, have nutritional benefits. They contain resistant starch and dietary fibre, which can make you feel full and support your digestive health. Plus, they provide essential vitamins and minerals.
  3. Plain Potatoes are Satisfying: Research has shown that plain-boiled potatoes are quite filling. They rank high on the “Satiety Index,” meaning they can help you feel satisfied with your meal. However, it’s often the toppings and additions like salt, oil, butter, and sour cream that contribute extra calories and may lead to weight gain.
  4. Consider Your Overall Diet: When making food choices, think about your entire diet and how different foods fit into it. It’s not just about one meal, but how your daily food choices align with your health and fitness goals.

In conclusion, this study offers insights into short-term effects, but remember that the bigger picture of your diet and individual preferences is vital for long-term health and weight management. As you make food choices, focus on balance and sustainability to achieve your health and fitness objectives.

The Potato Paradox: Rediscovering this Nutrient Powerhouse

Our culture has not always been kind to the humble potato. For generations, “peeling potatoes” was synonymous with punishment and drudgery. Today, potatoes are often considered a treat only in their “worst” forms, such as chips or fries. But even when they’re baked or boiled, potatoes are sometimes still disparaged. Low-carb advocates highlight that 90 percent of the potato’s calories come from neither protein nor fat, while others compare them unfavourably to sweet potatoes. However, a recent study aims to debunk the myths and misinformation surrounding the simple spud, advocating for a more prominent role in a healthy diet.


In the past, doctors and nutritionists often oversimplified carbohydrates and fats, with the former viewed as vastly superior. While some recognized the complexity, differentiating between types of fats was easier than categorizing carbohydrates. However, models like the 10:1 ratio of fibre to carbohydrates sought to differentiate “high quality” and “low quality” carbohydrates. This classification placed starchy vegetables, including potatoes, in the same category as highly-processed foods.

What the Study Found

In this study, scientists re-assessed carb-rich foods with additional criteria like mineral content and energy density. Interestingly, starchy vegetables, including potatoes, scored well in these assessments, sometimes even surpassing whole grains. This aligns more with the nutrient content of potatoes and offers a better perspective on their nutritional value.

A Potential Conflict of Interest

The study received support from industry groups, which should be noted but doesn’t necessarily invalidate the findings. It’s crucial to consider potential biases in such cases. While industry-funded studies are common, transparency and sound methodology are key.

Key Takeaways
  • Potatoes Deserve a Second Look: It’s time to reconsider the role of potatoes in your diet. Don’t let myths about their nutritional value hold you back. Both sweet and white potatoes offer essential nutrients, low energy density, and unique benefits.
  • Feel Full and Satisfied: Despite their reputation, potatoes are incredibly satisfying. They rank high on the satiety index, keeping you fuller for longer. This means you can enjoy them without constantly feeling hungry.
  • It’s About Preparation: The real issue with potatoes often lies in how we prepare and top them. Instead of blaming the spud, focus on healthier cooking methods and toppings. Small changes can lead to more significant improvements over time.

Rediscover the potato as a versatile and nutritious addition to your meals. It’s time to separate fact from fiction and enjoy this humble yet powerful vegetable.


The Surprising Twist in the Whole vs. Processed Debate

Think of it as a showdown between two sides: one rooting for whole or natural foods, the other cheering for super processed snacks. A recent study from the University of Washington adds a twist to this battle, showing that it’s not so black and white. The study reveals that making a meal plan from only natural foods isn’t easy, and some surprisingly good foods fall into the processed category. Let’s dig into the study’s details to understand what’s really going on and how it can help you make better food choices.

First, let’s get what we mean by “processed” foods. These are foods that have a little something extra added in, like more fat, sugar, or salt. They also have special things put in to make them taste better, last longer, or feel different in your mouth.

But here’s the shocker: Most of us think of sugary snacks as processed, which is true. But also, more than 90 out of 100 grains we eat, even the healthy ones like whole-wheat bread and oatmeal, are also called processed. Even 70 out of 100 of the beans, nuts, and seeds we eat fall into this category. It’s kinda confusing, right?

Study Breakdown

The scientists used a computer to cook up “healthy” diets that fit a few rules:

  • The diets had to be 2,000 calories exactly.
  • They had to give you enough of 22 important nutrients without giving you too much of anything else.
  • They had to be similar to what the 857 people in the Seattle Obesity Study ate.
  • The computer had a big list of 360 foods. Some were really natural, some a bit processed, and some super processed. 

The big question was: Can we create a good meal plan only from natural foods or just from super processed foods?

What the Study Found

The computer couldn’t make a perfect meal plan with only natural or only super processed foods. Only three combinations made meal plans that fit all the rules: One had foods from all groups. The others had foods from three groups but skipped the natural foods.

Here’s the twist: The problem was mostly with vitamin D. When they used half as much, the computer could make meal plans with only natural or only super processed foods. 


Processed Foods Aren’t Always Bad

Some processed foods are cool. They help us get nutrients, taste better, and are easy to eat. Some even have extra vitamins.

Not All Natural Foods Are Winners

Natural foods can be great, but not always. Sometimes less natural stuff can give us more energy, especially for folks who exercise a lot.

No Perfect Diet Exists

The computer-made meal plans had weird stuff like candy bars and fries. It shows that there’s no perfect food plan for everyone. People need different things to feel good.

In the food debate, things aren’t always simple. The recent study reminds us that processed foods aren’t always bad, and natural foods aren’t always the champions. It’s like a puzzle, and you have figure out what’s best for you. However, with a mix of foods that make you happy and healthy, you’re the real winner.


Sign Up. Keep Healthy. Save Money.

Join our newsletter, so we can reach you with our special offers and discounts, best health tips, and free access to our health webinars.

Copyright © 2022 Clardoon Enterprises Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Add to cart